AYROTV.COM, The recent decision by Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, the President of Somalia, to accept Turkish mediation in the ongoing strife within the nation raises significant concerns among Somali intellectuals, tribal leaders, and citizens alike. Somalia, a country historically scarred by civil war, terrorism, and the relentless interference of neighboring nations, finds itself at a critical juncture where sovereignty and territorial integrity hang in the balance.
The meddling of neighboring countries—Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Kenya—has been a persistent threat to Somalia’s stability. Each has pursued their own agendas, undermining the federal government and exploiting Somalia’s vulnerabilities. Djibouti’s President Ismael Omar Guelleh has notably interfered in Somalia’s internal affairs, attempting to manipulate the political landscape by imposing the representation of the Issa clan in the Somali Parliament. This imposition, which grants the Issa nine seats despite their representation of less than six percent of the population in the northern regions, is not only an affront to democratic principles but also a blatant violation of Somalia’s sovereignty.
Ethiopia’s ambitions are no less troubling. The country has long sought to annex parts of the Awdal region, particularly the strategically vital cities of Zayla and Lughaya, to establish a naval base and commercial ports. Ethiopia’s actions, including signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the so-called Somaliland, smuggling weapons, and training tribal militias without international oversight, exemplify its disregard for Somalia’s territorial integrity. Ethiopia’s colonial tactics of divide and rule, aided by corrupt regional leaders, pose existential threats to the Somali state.
In this context, Hassan Sheikh’s acceptance of Turkish mediation, without Ethiopia nullifying its MoU, raises critical questions. What are the implications of this agreement for the Somali people? It appears to many as an act of betrayal, undermining the very sovereignty that the Somali government is meant to protect. The decision has provoked outrage among those who view it as a capitulation to external pressures, particularly from a country that has historically threatened Somalia’s stability.
The silence of the African Union in light of these developments is equally troubling. An organization that should champion the sovereignty and territorial integrity of member states seems to be absent in the face of Ethiopia’s aggressive posturing. This lack of support further complicates the situation, leaving Somalia vulnerable and isolated.
Moreover, the apparent apathy of the Somali populace raises additional concerns. The lack of a unified response against external interference and internal betrayal suggests a troubling trend towards complacency. Somali citizens, intellectuals, and leaders must reflect on their national identity and the responsibility they hold in protecting their homeland from encroachment. The question remains: do they wish to surrender the land of their ancestors to foreign interests?
In conclusion, Hassan Sheikh’s decision to engage with Turkish mediation amid Ethiopia’s ongoing threats is a cause for alarm. It is imperative that Somalis stand united against both external interference and internal treachery. There is an urgent need for a collective awakening to safeguard the sovereignty and integrity of Somalia. The time has come for a resolute stand against those who seek to undermine the nation for their own gain. The future of Somalia depends on the actions of its people today.
By: BURAALE XINIIN
