An Examination of UNESCO’s Controversial Recognition of “XEER CIISE” as Cultural Heritage”
The recent decision by UNESCO to recognize “XEER CIISE” as a cultural heritage has sparked significant concern and condemnation, particularly among those who believe that this designation is less about genuine cultural appreciation and more about political maneuvering. Critics argue that this recognition is a product of a concerted effort by the Djiboutian regime, specifically driven by members of the Issa tribe, to promote their interests at the expense of other Somali cultural expressions and territorial gaine.
UNESCO’s criteria for recognizing cultural heritage are stringent, emphasizing that any designation must be of “outstanding value.” This raises a critical question: does “XEER CIISE” truly exemplify the rich and diverse cultural tapestry of the Somali people? The answer, according to many, is a resounding no. The Somali people are predominantly pastoral, and each tribe possesses its own unique “XEER,” or law. This tradition is not only a reflection of their cultural identity but also a vital aspect of their social structure.
Why, then, has “XEER CIISE” been singled out for recognition? Why not “XEER HABAR AWAL,” “XEER CIIDAGALE,” or “XEER WARSANGELI”? Each of these legal systems represents significant cultural heritage, yet none have received the same acknowledgement as “XEER CIISE.” This selective recognition raises questions about the methodologies employed in evaluating Somali cultural practices. What research was conducted to compare the various “XEER” systems among the Somali tribes? When and where did this evaluation take place? How do the claims attributing Siti and Zayla specifically to the Issa tribe hold up under scrutiny?
The credibility of UNESCO hinges on its impartiality and adherence to its own established criteria. The apparent lack of a thorough investigation into these questions suggests that the recognition of “XEER CIISE” may be more reflective of external political influences rather than an objective assessment of cultural significance. It is essential to consider the possibility that financial incentives may have swayed the decision-making process, leading to a fabricated narrative that overlooks the broader Somali cultural context.
In light of these concerns, it is imperative that UNESCO re-evaluates its recognition of “XEER CIISE.” An independent investigation into the processes that led to this designation is necessary to uphold the integrity of cultural heritage recognition and ensure that it is genuinely representative of the outstanding cultural values it purports to celebrate. The Somali people deserve a recognition process that honors the full spectrum of their cultural heritage, rather than one that serves the interests of a specific political agenda.
In conclusion, the recognition of “XEER CIISE” not only undermines the rich diversity of Somali culture but also poses a significant threat to the credibility of UNESCO as a guardian of global heritage. It is time for UNESCO to reflect on the implications of its decisions and to commit to a more inclusive and equitable approach to cultural recognition, one that respects and acknowledges the myriad contributions of all Somali tribes
By: BURAALE XINIIN
