Ayrotv.com- London- The recent elections in the so-called “Somaliland” have sparked significant debate regarding the nature of democracy in the region. While some observers have lauded the electoral process as a model of democratic governance, a closer examination reveals complexities that challenge this narrative. Central to this discussion is the fact that the major political contenders in the elections were all from the Isaaq clan, raising important questions about representation and inclusivity.
The leaders of the three main political parties—Muse Bihi of the Kulmiye party, A. Ciro of the Wadani party, and F. A. Waraabe of the Ucud party—are all members of the Isaaq clan. This homogeneity raises legitimate concerns about the political representation of the other major clans in Somaliland, including the Gadaboursi, Isse, Darood and others. In a truly democratic system, one would expect a diverse representation that includes voices from all segments of society. The absence of candidates from these other clans in a supposedly democratic election suggests a significant flaw in the electoral process and raises questions about the legitimacy of claims to democracy.
Moreover, the international community, including observers from various organizations, seems to overlook the intricate social fabric of Somaliland. The region, which once constituted the British Protectorate of Somaliland, encompasses five distinct regions, each with its own historical and cultural backgrounds. The unification of Somaliland with the former Italian Somaliland in 1960 to form the Republic of Somalia did not erase these identities; rather, it complicated them. The perception that Somaliland is a singular entity fails to acknowledge the diverse tribal and regional affiliations that shape the lives and politics of its people.
The ongoing discourse surrounding Somaliland’s quest for independence has often been framed as a struggle for self-determination. However, this narrative can obscure the broader implications for Somali unity and territorial integrity. The emergence of a separatist agenda, fueled by external influences and internal divisions, poses a risk to the stability of the entire region. It raises the alarming possibility that the international community may be inadvertently supporting the fragmentation of Somali society, reminiscent of historical injustices faced by other nations.
The concerns about foreign interference in Somali affairs are not unfounded. The parallels drawn between Somalia’s situation and that of Palestine underscore the fears of a world where powerful nations exploit weaker ones for their own gains. The question arises: Is Somalia on a path toward becoming another victim of geopolitical manoeuvring, where its sovereignty and territorial integrity are compromised in favour of external interests?
As the Somali people continue to navigate their political landscape, it is crucial for international organizations to reassess their positions and policies regarding the so-called “Somaliland”first and Somalia at large. The call for a more inclusive and representative political structure is not just a plea for fairness; it is a demand for a sustainable peace that respects the rights and identities of all clans within the Somali nation.
In conclusion, the narrative of democracy in the so-called “Somaliland” must be critically examined in light of the underlying social dynamics and historical contexts. The voices of all clans must be included in the political discourse to ensure a truly representative governance structure. As the world watches, it is imperative to advocate for a future where the sovereignty and unity of Somalia are upheld, allowing its people to forge their path without the shadows of external manipulation. Time will reveal whether humanity has learned from its past and whether the ideals of justice and equality will prevail for the Somali people.
By: PROF. BURAALE XINIIN
