In the wake of a protracted civil war and ongoing conflicts with the Al Shabab terrorist group, Somalia has made significant strides toward stability and security. With the support of the African Union, the international community, and close allies, Somalia has rebuilt its national army and is working diligently to foster peace and unity within its borders. However, this journey is fraught with challenges, particularly from neighbouring countries that undermine Somalia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
One of the most pressing issues in this context is the special status accorded to the so-called “Somaliland” , an etho supremacist regime that operates with a degree of autonomy from the federal government in Mogadishu. Unlike other regional states globally—such as the Tigray region in Ethiopia or the Bavarian region in Germany—the so-called “Somaliland” receives international attention and observers during its elections. This raises critical questions about the motivations behind this differential treatment. Why is “Somaliland” viewed differently, and what agendas might be influencing this perception?
The situation becomes even more complicated when considering the involvement of Ethiopia, which has historically had a contentious relationship with Somalia. Ethiopia’s attempts to engage with regional leaders from Somalia, often seen as a violation of Somalia’s sovereignty, go unnoticed by international bodies like the African Union and the United Nations. This lack of response raises concerns about the complicity of these organizations in undermining Somalia’s integrity as a federal state.
Additionally, there are alarming speculations regarding external interests in the Awdal and Salal regions, particularly concerning control over strategic waterways like the Gulf of Aden and Bab el-Mandeb. The alleged involvement of countries such as Israel and the UAE in these dynamics suggests a dangerous geopolitical game that could destabilize the Horn of Africa further.
Human rights violations in the so-called “Somaliland ” have also been overshadowed by the focus on the regional election in the so-called “Somaliland .” The international community’s apparent indifference to the plight of the Somali people, particularly in the Awdal/Salal, and Gabiley District, is troubling. The potential for conflict, fueled by ethnic and regional divides, looms large as the Isaaq tribe, a minority in the broader Somali context, is pitted against other tribes. This could ignite tensions that have been simmering for generations.
The Awdal State Movement has issued a clarion call to the African Union, the United Nations, the Arab League, and the broader international community to recognize the gravity of the situation. It urges these entities to intervene and prevent Ethiopia and its allies from instigating further conflict in Somalia. Upholding international law and ensuring the respect for Somalia’s sovereignty is crucial for maintaining peace and stability in the region.
In conclusion, Somalia’s journey toward stability is commendable, but it is overshadowed by external pressures and internal divisions. The unique status of Somaliland, the involvement of neighbouring countries, and the potential for renewed conflict highlight the complexities of the situation. For true peace to be achieved, all stakeholders must engage in a dialogue that respects Somalia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, ensuring that the rights and voices of all Somali people are upheld
By: BURAALE XINIIN
