Ayrotv.com- The ongoing discourse around the federal system in Somalia highlights a notable double standard regarding the treatment of various regions, particularly in the north. While the Somali Federal Government (SFG) acknowledges and recognizes the existence of distinct regions in northern Somalia, it simultaneously exhibits a different policy stance that undermines the autonomy and needs of those same regions. This inconsistency raises critical questions about the principles of federalism and the rights of various tribes and regions to govern themselves according to their unique circumstances.
At the core of the issue is the perception that the SFG promotes a monolithic identity for the north, urging the dissolution of the five regions—Awdal, Khatumo, Maakhir, Togdheer, and Woqooyi Galbeed—into a singular entity dubbed “Somaliland.” Proponents of this viewpoint often argue that such consolidation is necessary for stability and governance. However, this narrative tends to overlook the historical context and the diverse needs of the tribes inhabiting these regions.
It is crucial to clarify that the notion of “Somaliland” as a united region was not a universally accepted concept among the northern tribes. The peace pact established after the fall of the military regime in 1991 was a significant milestone where tribal leaders from the northern regions came together, emphasizing the importance of maintaining regional autonomy until stability could be achieved in Mogadishu. This agreement was rooted in a mutual understanding that each region had the right to self-governance, reflecting their distinct cultural and social needs.
Unfortunately, the ambitions of certain groups, particularly the Isaaq and remnants of the Somali National Movement (SNM), have led to a narrative that seeks to marginalize other regions and tribes. The collaboration with external actors, such as Ethiopia, has further complicated the situation, as there are fears that such alliances aim to dismantle the greater Somali framework for personal gain. This has resulted in a governance structure that appears to prioritize the interests of a select few while neglecting the rights and aspirations of the broader population.
Regions like Awdal State, Khatumo State, and Maakhir State have legitimate claims for recognition and should be afforded the status of regional states within Somalia. The desire of Togdheer and Woqooyi Galbeed to pursue their own paths should be a matter for the federal government to address, rather than being used as a justification to disregard the rights of other regions. The autonomy of each region is vital not only for fostering local governance but also for ensuring that the diverse needs of Somalia’s tribes are met.
It is imperative for those advocating for a united “Somaliland” to recognize the rich tapestry of Somalia’s history and the distinct identities of its regions. The reduction of these regions into a singular entity undermines the federal system that is meant to empower local governance and reflect the diversity of the Somali people. Ignoring the rights of Awdal, Sool, and Sanaag will only serve to perpetuate division and conflict.
In conclusion, the Somali Federal Government must reassess its approach to regional governance and embrace the federal principles that allow for autonomy and self-determination. Recognizing the unique identities and needs of each region is not only a matter of justice but also a pathway to achieving lasting peace and stability in Somalia. It is time for all stakeholders to engage in a constructive dialogue that respects the rights of every region and tribe, paving the way for a more inclusive and equitable federal system.
PRO. BURAALE XINIIN
